Originally shared by Wil Hutton
Yesterday, the Ninth Circuit Court ruled that realistic portrayals of celebrities were not protected by the First Amendment. Are there repercussions for RPGs?
Google+ community from Dec 2012 to March 2019
Yesterday, the Ninth Circuit Court ruled that realistic portrayals of celebrities were not protected by the First…
Originally shared by Wil Hutton
Yesterday, the Ninth Circuit Court ruled that realistic portrayals of celebrities were not protected by the First Amendment. Are there repercussions for RPGs?
Comments are closed.
How do they define ‘realistic’? I can see a very broad definition impacting far more than just RPG’s. What about political cartoons, MAD magazine, celebrity impersonations and look-a-likes?
How do they define ‘realistic’? I can see a very broad definition impacting far more than just RPG’s. What about political cartoons, MAD magazine, celebrity impersonations and look-a-likes?
shane jensen Satire, parody and comedy are protected as free expression/fair use. That pretty much never changes.
shane jensen Satire, parody and comedy are protected as free expression/fair use. That pretty much never changes.
After Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell, even outright slander is protected.
After Hustler Magazine, Inc. v. Falwell, even outright slander is protected.