I’m back with yet another version of the DWCK. This one replaces Alignments with Jeremy Strandberg ‘s Drives!!!!

I’m back with yet another version of the DWCK. This one replaces Alignments with Jeremy Strandberg ‘s Drives!!!!

I’m back with yet another version of the DWCK. This one replaces Alignments with Jeremy Strandberg ‘s Drives!!!!

Enjoy! (…and as always, please remember to 1st make a copy before using this sheet).

36 thoughts on “I’m back with yet another version of the DWCK. This one replaces Alignments with Jeremy Strandberg ‘s Drives!!!!”

  1. Jason Cordova nope Immolator is not in there. But I could certainly add it and…. the psion, initiate, mage, priest, and templar. I just got a nice contract there hehehe…. back to the drawing board.

  2. Jason Cordova nope Immolator is not in there. But I could certainly add it and…. the psion, initiate, mage, priest, and templar. I just got a nice contract there hehehe…. back to the drawing board.

  3. I would love to have Replacement Bard in there as I have a character that is that (Gorric) and we are using this tool but I do believe that it is not a distributable playbook. Is that right Jason Cordova​​ ?

  4. I would love to have Replacement Bard in there as I have a character that is that (Gorric) and we are using this tool but I do believe that it is not a distributable playbook. Is that right Jason Cordova​​ ?

  5. Jeremy Strandberg Great Drives document! This is going into my con bag. (I didn’t see comment enabled, “Evangalism” is misspelled > Evangelism)

  6. Jeremy Strandberg Great Drives document! This is going into my con bag. (I didn’t see comment enabled, “Evangalism” is misspelled > Evangelism)

  7. Ping! Maxime Lacoste​ Drive says you’ve trashed this! Has there been an update? Also, you might want to share it for View only, then people won’t accidentally muck it up…

  8. Ping! Maxime Lacoste​ Drive says you’ve trashed this! Has there been an update? Also, you might want to share it for View only, then people won’t accidentally muck it up…

  9. A “fill in the blanks” class option might be the best for players who want to use custom classes. It’s not really doable to get every class people want to play, especially since there’s so many people creating cool new stuff for DW!

  10. A “fill in the blanks” class option might be the best for players who want to use custom classes. It’s not really doable to get every class people want to play, especially since there’s so many people creating cool new stuff for DW!

  11. I know players can overwrite & fill in the blanks anyway. But that’s a way of making it clear up front. That way, if someone comes to you and asks “Why isn’t custom class x included?” you can simply point them to the fill in the blanks option.

  12. I know players can overwrite & fill in the blanks anyway. But that’s a way of making it clear up front. That way, if someone comes to you and asks “Why isn’t custom class x included?” you can simply point them to the fill in the blanks option.

Comments are closed.